Posts
Kinetic frenetics aside, people do seem to be "busier" than ever, but, strangely, getting accomplished less of real consequence. It is as if much on earth were "busy work," designed, not to accomplish anything real, but simply to distract the Soul. Maybe, so that It will not notice that It is God (Love) in temporary incarnation? Anyway, keep your mind on the Love-journey (spirituality), and you will live never to regret it!
Guaranteed!:)
Friday, December 03, 2004
Spirituality and Geography
When I was an "Old Testament" (correctly, "Hebrew Scriptures") student, we studied many maps of the region of Mesopotamia and environs of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. There seems to be little doubt that it is the cradle of civilization.
Is this the location of the Biblical "Garden of Eden"? Mystics, and now, most scholars, believe that the "Genesis" story is allegory. In other words, it is seen as a symbolic tale regarding our "fall from grace," and indicating the Way back. And allegories are not relevant to geography. If it is an allegory, and it seems that it might well be, for "Eden" means "pleasure," then the "Garden of Eden" has no geographic location.
Since much if not all the rest of the Hebrew Scriptures are also
allegorical, the same principle applies. And Revelation is recognized by almost every Christian, and all others, as an allegory. My new book, The Apocalypse of Love: Mystical Symbolism in Revelation, is a verse-by-verse study of the Revelation, the final book of the Bible.
The geography of this tiny dustmote, this nanosphere called "earth" is not relevant to true spirituality. Just as deepest spirituality is completely independent of history, so it is also of geography. So, despite the predictable panic and excitement of worldenders, which occurs every couple of years, the Bible's multiple mentions of Iraq have nothing to do with healthy spirituality.
Is this the location of the Biblical "Garden of Eden"? Mystics, and now, most scholars, believe that the "Genesis" story is allegory. In other words, it is seen as a symbolic tale regarding our "fall from grace," and indicating the Way back. And allegories are not relevant to geography. If it is an allegory, and it seems that it might well be, for "Eden" means "pleasure," then the "Garden of Eden" has no geographic location.
Since much if not all the rest of the Hebrew Scriptures are also
allegorical, the same principle applies. And Revelation is recognized by almost every Christian, and all others, as an allegory. My new book, The Apocalypse of Love: Mystical Symbolism in Revelation, is a verse-by-verse study of the Revelation, the final book of the Bible.
The geography of this tiny dustmote, this nanosphere called "earth" is not relevant to true spirituality. Just as deepest spirituality is completely independent of history, so it is also of geography. So, despite the predictable panic and excitement of worldenders, which occurs every couple of years, the Bible's multiple mentions of Iraq have nothing to do with healthy spirituality.
Thursday, December 02, 2004
Finding Freedom
God is "in" us. The confusion arises from trying to see "God" as "another person." God is not a literal or physical "person," but an extremely deep level of Mind. In this very deep Unconscious lie perfect Love, perfect wisdom, perfect tranquillity, perfect bliss, etc.
When, through stillmind (crystalmind), in deepest meditation, we touch this Mind, we know many things that are revealed to us. The Greeks called this deep wisdom-state, in which living Love is felt as the Core of your own being, "gnosis." This is the mystical experience.
What is that? It is a powerfully moving and touching experience, often bringing forth floods of tears. But they are not tears of sadness. Instead, during this event, you see Something --and It is inside you-- that is so unutterably beautiful, so amazingly tranquil,and so immeasurably loving that it blows your mind. When you have this experience, your life is changed forever, for the better. You realize that you are not your ego-- the person named "Joe"-- but that you are the Soul, and "Joe" is just a role that It is playing in the "stageplay" of this earthlife. The ego "Joe" is not, iow, your whole Self. "You" are a Soul-- birthless, deathless, timeless, of enormous beauty and magnificent wisdom.
Your Soul is deep within your mind; and the Spirit (Absolute; God) is deep within your Soul. This is ultimate Mind, Ultramind, the great Dreamer Who is dreaming up the cosmos through your nervousystem. You are within that dream right at this moment. This whole "everyday" or "normal" worldis but a dream-- the dream of cosmic Mind. And He/She is using your mind to dream it up!
When you see the world this way, tragedies are not so horrible, and traumas not so nightmarish. The world cannot "cut" as "deeply." It brings you to a special altered state of mind that mystics call "detachment," which is not coolness, apathy, or aloofness. Detachment is just the realization that the world does not control you. It is awesome freedom!:)
Parable: Appreciate Love
Once upon a time, a man punished his 5-year-old daughter for wasting expensive gold wrapping paper. Money was tight, and so was he. He became ferocious when she pasted it on a box to put under the Christmas tree.
Still, she brought the box to him the next morning and said, "This is for you, Daddy."
He was embarrassed by his earlier overreaction. But his anger flared again when he found the box empty. He screamed at her, "What the hell is this? Don't you know, young lady, that when you give someone a present, there's supposed to be something inside the damn' package?"
She looked up at him, her eyes filled with tears. She said, "Daddy, it's not empty. I blew kisses into it until it was full."
Later, she was killed in an accident. He kept that gold box by his bed for all the remaining years of his life. And whenever he was discouraged or faced difficult problems he opened the box. He would take out an imaginary kiss. He could only remember the child who had put it there. Remembering her sweet Love, he would sob late into the night.
*******
Each of us has been given a "golden box" filled with unconditional Love. It has come from our children, family, friends and God (Love) within.
There is no more precious possession.
Still, she brought the box to him the next morning and said, "This is for you, Daddy."
He was embarrassed by his earlier overreaction. But his anger flared again when he found the box empty. He screamed at her, "What the hell is this? Don't you know, young lady, that when you give someone a present, there's supposed to be something inside the damn' package?"
She looked up at him, her eyes filled with tears. She said, "Daddy, it's not empty. I blew kisses into it until it was full."
Later, she was killed in an accident. He kept that gold box by his bed for all the remaining years of his life. And whenever he was discouraged or faced difficult problems he opened the box. He would take out an imaginary kiss. He could only remember the child who had put it there. Remembering her sweet Love, he would sob late into the night.
*******
Each of us has been given a "golden box" filled with unconditional Love. It has come from our children, family, friends and God (Love) within.
There is no more precious possession.
Mystic Path to Cosmic Power - Book Review
I read the book Mystic Path to Cosmic Power about two decades ago. The title is a bit of a misnomer, as it has nothing to do with mysticism or the Way, except possibly a few peripheral quotations. It is, instead, about trying to "take over the cosmos," using your egomind (conscious mind) to "get" whatever you want. It is simply disguised as a "mystical" work, but is really just another "desire-multiplication" book, designed to proliferate rather than diminish egodesire. In that context, oddly, the book is actually antimystical. This guy has written several other books, and in my premystical days, I read another re "telecosmic" power. (They are all the same.:)
Ancient History, Religion, and Spirituality
Our new Way (the mystical path) has absolutely nothing to do with history. For example, we tend to see the Bible as a book filled with some history, some legend, some allegory, and many other components. Did a guy named "Moses" ever really exist? Or was he just legend? Honestly, this has no effect whatsoever on true spirituality, and so, is irrelevant.
Completely outside of vast interests in spirituality, however, many of us do find ancient history to be a captivating study. Mostly, we are interested, to be straightforward, in the more "aquarian" facets-- the indications, and nature, of the mysterious "gods," etc. A main nucleus of this theme is, Did extraterrestrials visit this planet in ancient times, and interact with the indigenous populations? This theory helps to explain many mysteries of history and of the Bible. For example, "Jehovah" was one of these "gods," called elohim by the ancient Hebrews. All cultures everywhere claim that very much in communication (including alphabets), mathematics, science (especially astronomy and astrology), medicine, and even laws to create social order were the "gifts of the gods."
Perhaps the most important of these beings, for society, was "Jehovah," more correctly named "Yahweh." He seems to have been one of the less-developed, less-intelligent, of the gods. He was violent, perhaps suffering from psychosis, and could not abide much celebration and fun. This anti-joyful aspect still pervades so very much in religion. And this attitude of, "If it's fun, it must be wrong," we owe to this primitive god-image.
Tuesday, November 30, 2004
Mysticism: Review
It is a fine use of time to "think on these things," as the mystic Paul wrote.
It is common for a mystic not publicly to identify herself as a "mystic." The word "mystic" is capable of terrible and horrifying misunderstandings. People apply it to everything from spiritual elitists to occultists.
The only time that a mystic is likely to so identify herself is when she has a chance to teach, and so, clarify that she is neither a spiritual elitist nor an occultist. If you were to ask the sweet old lady, Theresa of India, what she thought of herself, she would likely say that she is just an "ordinary" woman who has been gifted with an extraordinary calling and/or Love, which is not her own.
The greatest sickness in our world is the lack or absence of Love, intimacy, and even simple courtesy and friendliness. As Lao Tzu says, it is when the sage-mystic "gets sick of sickness" that she starts to discover a cure. And that healing is to allow more of the deep inner Lovemind to express Him/Herself through the "transparent" mind of the mystic. This is called "crystalmind."
I did not mean to suggest that Theresa made it an ironclad "rule" or "law" set in granite that no one call her "mother." It is just that mystics almost universally reject honorifics. Is this "only" symbolic? Yes, of course. A mystic is selfdefined by neither praise nor blame. Of course, nothing changes in selfimage when one receives a title from others. Theresa was likely only yielding to the tradition of her Church when she accepted the title "Mother." What I meant to imply was precisely the fact that she did not define her value in terms of this title. With intuitive knowing, I knew that she would have been more comfortable without it altogether.
In her own words, Theresa attempted to clarify this position: She was working for the mystical state called "detachment," which is not aloofness or irresponsivity, but simply a state of freedom in which one is not controlled by the world or environment.
Mystics do not live by dogmatic or granitic laws. It is a common tradition that, after the mystical experience, they do change their names. Still, lest this become a dogma, we should make it crystalclear that a number of mystics use also their given earthly names (birthnames)as well. When Jesus was born, he was named "Immanuel," but somewhere along the line, changed his name to "Jesus." Peter also was born with the name Cephas, and Paul with the name Saul, etc.
So, I've no objection to using the birthname. Even mystics historically and traditionally do this. But there is this: When Mary Smith has a transformative experience, and then says, "I am Mary Smith," she feels, correctly, as if she is lying: She has become so much more than Mary Smith.
What the mystic must watch, microscopically and assiduously, is her major challenge: ego. For it will, in a splitsecond, reassert itself as the master of her life, and will be delighted to "take over again," just like in the "bad ol' days." It is controlled by fear-- the mystic's only real enemy. The mystic has no human enemies. And even the ego can be seen as teacher rather than nemesis.
The mystic does not take her egoname with deadly, utter seriousness. The ego is just a mask, a role being played on the stage, in the play, of life, by the real Soul. And it is cosmic Mind that is "playing the role" of the Soul. But the mystic must be aware of and beware the cunning, subtle schemes of ego to take over her life, and control everything, as it once did.
Because God is playing every role, the mystic lives as a "part of God." Her mind grows towards becoming, or complete identification with, the cosmic Mind of Love.
So, the human name is only a tag or label, used for convenience. It in no way encompasses the totality of her being, nor does it describe in any way her infinite Mind.
People as a rule, on the whole, are growing and becoming gradually more spiritual. This is precisely why an educational enterprise of spiritual understanding is needed at this time.
The Spirit, Coremind, dreams up the cosmos. It does this in a subsector of Spirit called the "Creator." (This is Creatormind or Dreamind.)
The world is dreamed by the Spirit, but experienced by the conscious mind. The Spirit, being perfect, dreams up a world that is potentially perfect.
The Soul lies "halfway" between Spirit and conscious mind. As the Spirit is "sending" the dream to the conscious mind, it must pass through the Soul. When the Soul gets the dream from the Spirit, it adds its own karmic contents. (The personal Unconscious and preconscious do the same.) So, by the time that the world is perceived by the conscious mind, it is not perfect. That is, it is not all Love-filled, beauty, tranquility, bliss, etc. This is because the final dream that we call "everyday reality" has been modified by the Soul and the personal Unconscious.
The mystic wants to work towards an omega-point, a zenith in Mind, called the "allembracing" or "allgood" Mind, in which everything is seen to be good. Thus, she wants to grow to the point where all things are seen to be good. This means, as you imply, overcoming even bionature. For we are repelled at an organic or biological level by some things. (This is no doubt bioprotective.) To embrace the rabbit and puppy as "God" is easy. But it is not so easy to embrace, or even to like, the rattlesnake and the tarantula. And when it comes to the even less-pleasant things, they offend our natural and esthetic sensitivities.
Still, the full assignment of the mystic is to return to "eden," or "pleasure," and so, to find that all things are good, to be interpreted as the dream of One. That One is the good and perfect Mind, and cannot dream up anything that is bad or imperfect. And because Creatormind is also all beauty, He/She cannot dream up anything that is truly "ugly."
The entire point is that "bad" and "ugly" are just labels, and do not represent the "intrinsicity" of anything or anyone. So, we are given the greatest challenge of all-- to overcome our longstanding "prejudices," however deep their roots, and even if they are organic (built into the biosystem.)
Of course, people have different sensibilities and sensitivities. But mysticism calls us all to the one path, no matter what our natures. Is it more difficult for one than for another? Yes, certainly, especially this one of the "allembracing Mind." But other parts of the Way would be more difficult for other temperaments. For example, nonmaterialism is more challenging for taurus people than for sagittarians or geminis. The Way of silence is much more difficult for geminis and libras than for capricorns, etc.
Poverty, purification, etc. are often linked together in the development of the mystic's higher consciousness. Not that we must go to the extreme of Franciscan poverty. In fact, avoiding extremes, the modern mystic wants to stay out of poverty. At the other end of that same spectrum, she must avoid greed, which means taking more than her fair share of the pie of earthly resources. The perfect solution? Simplicity. This is described in my book Simplicity Made Simple: The Economics of Compassion.
For simplicity avoids both poverty and extreme greed and wealth. This Way enhances respect for the earth's limited resources,and also for our brothers and sisters.
Historically, mystics have often embraced actual poverty, but this has often been more symbolic of renunciation than any kind of "requirement" for the pursuit of mysticism.
It is common for a mystic not publicly to identify herself as a "mystic." The word "mystic" is capable of terrible and horrifying misunderstandings. People apply it to everything from spiritual elitists to occultists.
The only time that a mystic is likely to so identify herself is when she has a chance to teach, and so, clarify that she is neither a spiritual elitist nor an occultist. If you were to ask the sweet old lady, Theresa of India, what she thought of herself, she would likely say that she is just an "ordinary" woman who has been gifted with an extraordinary calling and/or Love, which is not her own.
The greatest sickness in our world is the lack or absence of Love, intimacy, and even simple courtesy and friendliness. As Lao Tzu says, it is when the sage-mystic "gets sick of sickness" that she starts to discover a cure. And that healing is to allow more of the deep inner Lovemind to express Him/Herself through the "transparent" mind of the mystic. This is called "crystalmind."
I did not mean to suggest that Theresa made it an ironclad "rule" or "law" set in granite that no one call her "mother." It is just that mystics almost universally reject honorifics. Is this "only" symbolic? Yes, of course. A mystic is selfdefined by neither praise nor blame. Of course, nothing changes in selfimage when one receives a title from others. Theresa was likely only yielding to the tradition of her Church when she accepted the title "Mother." What I meant to imply was precisely the fact that she did not define her value in terms of this title. With intuitive knowing, I knew that she would have been more comfortable without it altogether.
In her own words, Theresa attempted to clarify this position: She was working for the mystical state called "detachment," which is not aloofness or irresponsivity, but simply a state of freedom in which one is not controlled by the world or environment.
Mystics do not live by dogmatic or granitic laws. It is a common tradition that, after the mystical experience, they do change their names. Still, lest this become a dogma, we should make it crystalclear that a number of mystics use also their given earthly names (birthnames)as well. When Jesus was born, he was named "Immanuel," but somewhere along the line, changed his name to "Jesus." Peter also was born with the name Cephas, and Paul with the name Saul, etc.
So, I've no objection to using the birthname. Even mystics historically and traditionally do this. But there is this: When Mary Smith has a transformative experience, and then says, "I am Mary Smith," she feels, correctly, as if she is lying: She has become so much more than Mary Smith.
What the mystic must watch, microscopically and assiduously, is her major challenge: ego. For it will, in a splitsecond, reassert itself as the master of her life, and will be delighted to "take over again," just like in the "bad ol' days." It is controlled by fear-- the mystic's only real enemy. The mystic has no human enemies. And even the ego can be seen as teacher rather than nemesis.
The mystic does not take her egoname with deadly, utter seriousness. The ego is just a mask, a role being played on the stage, in the play, of life, by the real Soul. And it is cosmic Mind that is "playing the role" of the Soul. But the mystic must be aware of and beware the cunning, subtle schemes of ego to take over her life, and control everything, as it once did.
Because God is playing every role, the mystic lives as a "part of God." Her mind grows towards becoming, or complete identification with, the cosmic Mind of Love.
So, the human name is only a tag or label, used for convenience. It in no way encompasses the totality of her being, nor does it describe in any way her infinite Mind.
People as a rule, on the whole, are growing and becoming gradually more spiritual. This is precisely why an educational enterprise of spiritual understanding is needed at this time.
The Spirit, Coremind, dreams up the cosmos. It does this in a subsector of Spirit called the "Creator." (This is Creatormind or Dreamind.)
The world is dreamed by the Spirit, but experienced by the conscious mind. The Spirit, being perfect, dreams up a world that is potentially perfect.
The Soul lies "halfway" between Spirit and conscious mind. As the Spirit is "sending" the dream to the conscious mind, it must pass through the Soul. When the Soul gets the dream from the Spirit, it adds its own karmic contents. (The personal Unconscious and preconscious do the same.) So, by the time that the world is perceived by the conscious mind, it is not perfect. That is, it is not all Love-filled, beauty, tranquility, bliss, etc. This is because the final dream that we call "everyday reality" has been modified by the Soul and the personal Unconscious.
The mystic wants to work towards an omega-point, a zenith in Mind, called the "allembracing" or "allgood" Mind, in which everything is seen to be good. Thus, she wants to grow to the point where all things are seen to be good. This means, as you imply, overcoming even bionature. For we are repelled at an organic or biological level by some things. (This is no doubt bioprotective.) To embrace the rabbit and puppy as "God" is easy. But it is not so easy to embrace, or even to like, the rattlesnake and the tarantula. And when it comes to the even less-pleasant things, they offend our natural and esthetic sensitivities.
Still, the full assignment of the mystic is to return to "eden," or "pleasure," and so, to find that all things are good, to be interpreted as the dream of One. That One is the good and perfect Mind, and cannot dream up anything that is bad or imperfect. And because Creatormind is also all beauty, He/She cannot dream up anything that is truly "ugly."
The entire point is that "bad" and "ugly" are just labels, and do not represent the "intrinsicity" of anything or anyone. So, we are given the greatest challenge of all-- to overcome our longstanding "prejudices," however deep their roots, and even if they are organic (built into the biosystem.)
Of course, people have different sensibilities and sensitivities. But mysticism calls us all to the one path, no matter what our natures. Is it more difficult for one than for another? Yes, certainly, especially this one of the "allembracing Mind." But other parts of the Way would be more difficult for other temperaments. For example, nonmaterialism is more challenging for taurus people than for sagittarians or geminis. The Way of silence is much more difficult for geminis and libras than for capricorns, etc.
Poverty, purification, etc. are often linked together in the development of the mystic's higher consciousness. Not that we must go to the extreme of Franciscan poverty. In fact, avoiding extremes, the modern mystic wants to stay out of poverty. At the other end of that same spectrum, she must avoid greed, which means taking more than her fair share of the pie of earthly resources. The perfect solution? Simplicity. This is described in my book Simplicity Made Simple: The Economics of Compassion.
For simplicity avoids both poverty and extreme greed and wealth. This Way enhances respect for the earth's limited resources,and also for our brothers and sisters.
Historically, mystics have often embraced actual poverty, but this has often been more symbolic of renunciation than any kind of "requirement" for the pursuit of mysticism.
Pot and Spirituality
Is it "evil" to smoke pot? Wise and good people always obey the law when possible, and pot is illegal.
Is the act of getting high "evil"? No, for nature wants us to enjoy our lives, to create as much joy as possible. In fact,our brains are "drug-factories." They produce a number of families of natural drugs, one family of which is sedatives, and another, euphorics. (A "euphoric" is a drug designed to lift the spirits, to create happiness or natural "highs.") After sex, for example, most people feel these chemicals released from the brain into the bloodstream. Also, other happy events can give us "natural highs." These can last from minutes to hours.
But the fact that we are capable of any number of varieties of natural highs does not automatically okay the use of artificial or natural drugs. Certain cultures use psychotropic agents to boost their spirituality at times, as part of their sacraments. The Rostafarians use ghanja (pot)sacramentally. Is this "evil"? No, for they are sincerely seeking God(Love).
Still, drugs are far too dangerous to use carelessly, for mere "recreation" or entertainment. True, some drugs are "natural." But so is arsenic; but that does not mean that nature created it to be ingested by human beings.
Does the mystic have anything personally against the moderate use of mild drugs? If a drug is used sacramentally, in a sacred manner, by adults, there can be a place for its moderate use. An example is the use of alcohol-- a very potent drug--in the Eucharist or Communion services of most Christian faiths.
This issue can be of great importance to young people. Many of them are too inexperienced to use drugs moderately, or wisely. Everyone reaches that stage, at around age sixteen, of intense and relentless curiosity. The real concern is that the young, inexperienced person will get involved with a drug "crowd," and lose all her spiritual progress. The use of mind-altering substances is dangerous, but the crowd who uses them might be as great a peril. Not wanting to see her spirituality-- such as it is, in embryo-form-- crushed and shattered, we need to do everything possible, reasonable, and loving to support young people who have begun the interior Journey. Everything that we do, we should do
sacramentally-- as a part of our spirituality, and not outside of, or contrary to, it.
Is the act of getting high "evil"? No, for nature wants us to enjoy our lives, to create as much joy as possible. In fact,our brains are "drug-factories." They produce a number of families of natural drugs, one family of which is sedatives, and another, euphorics. (A "euphoric" is a drug designed to lift the spirits, to create happiness or natural "highs.") After sex, for example, most people feel these chemicals released from the brain into the bloodstream. Also, other happy events can give us "natural highs." These can last from minutes to hours.
But the fact that we are capable of any number of varieties of natural highs does not automatically okay the use of artificial or natural drugs. Certain cultures use psychotropic agents to boost their spirituality at times, as part of their sacraments. The Rostafarians use ghanja (pot)sacramentally. Is this "evil"? No, for they are sincerely seeking God(Love).
Still, drugs are far too dangerous to use carelessly, for mere "recreation" or entertainment. True, some drugs are "natural." But so is arsenic; but that does not mean that nature created it to be ingested by human beings.
Does the mystic have anything personally against the moderate use of mild drugs? If a drug is used sacramentally, in a sacred manner, by adults, there can be a place for its moderate use. An example is the use of alcohol-- a very potent drug--in the Eucharist or Communion services of most Christian faiths.
This issue can be of great importance to young people. Many of them are too inexperienced to use drugs moderately, or wisely. Everyone reaches that stage, at around age sixteen, of intense and relentless curiosity. The real concern is that the young, inexperienced person will get involved with a drug "crowd," and lose all her spiritual progress. The use of mind-altering substances is dangerous, but the crowd who uses them might be as great a peril. Not wanting to see her spirituality-- such as it is, in embryo-form-- crushed and shattered, we need to do everything possible, reasonable, and loving to support young people who have begun the interior Journey. Everything that we do, we should do
sacramentally-- as a part of our spirituality, and not outside of, or contrary to, it.
The Miracle of Communication
Contemplation re communication has been occurring. "Communication" shares two roots with "communion," the major teaching, and the apex and zenith, of the Enlightenment Tradition. How astonishing is it that two or more minds can communicate, and even join for moments, through squiggly lines on paper, or through the correct arrangement of teeth, tongue, and airflow!
Monday, November 29, 2004
The "Donkey" (Physical Body) as Teacher
We have all come to earth to a very difficult and challenging life formed, designed, and created by our Souls for the purpose of growing our inner Lovenature. Only giant Souls have taken on giant tasks, Love 401 instead of Love 101!
If you have major challenges in your life, you must be precisely such an advanced Soul. Spiritual advancement can be gauged by how difficult are chosen challenges. "Baby" Souls are very frightened of life, and avoid challenging assignments. But more experienced Souls feel capable of taking on missions which terrify them.
Our greatest teachers are often our "donkeys," or physical bodies. (St. Francis called his body "Brother Ass," which sounds so harsh in English that it has been modified to the petname of endearment "Brother Donkey.":)
This "donkey" is a most intimate "laboratory." And labwork is unavoidable in the course. That is the first factor that makes the donkey such a good and sound teacher. The second is that you cannot avoid it: You cannot stay outside of your body for very long. So, you cannot avoid somatic tests.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)